Why UVA changes far less with the seasons than UVB

A widely repeated line holds that UVA is "constant year-round." That is not quite true, and the accurate version is more interesting. UVA does fall in winter — but UVB falls two to three times more steeply. The result is that winter sunlight, and early-morning and late-afternoon sunlight, is disproportionately UVA. This is the single strongest reason a sunburn-weighted UV Index cannot represent your real ultraviolet exposure.

The correction worth making: UVA is not seasonally constant. At 50° latitude, clear-sky midday UVA in December is roughly a quarter of its June value. Over the same swing, the UV Index typically drops by a factor of eight to ten. It is the ratio that shifts, not the absolute UVA that stays put.

The cause: ozone absorbs UVB, and ignores UVA

Ozone's absorption of ultraviolet is not a gentle gradient — it falls off a cliff. Across the UVB band the absorption cross-section drops by several orders of magnitude from 300 nm to 320 nm, and by the time you reach the middle of the UVA band ozone is effectively transparent. Ozone is, in practical terms, a filter that acts on UVB and leaves UVA alone.

Now add geometry. When the sun is low — in winter, or early and late in the day — its light enters the atmosphere at a shallow angle and travels a much longer path to reach you. At a solar zenith angle of 73°, that path is roughly 3.4 times longer than with the sun overhead.

Put the two together and the asymmetry becomes stark. A longer path through a strong absorber removes UVB exponentially. A longer path through something that barely absorbs your wavelength costs you comparatively little — UVA loses mostly to scattering, which is a much gentler penalty. The same low sun that decimates UVB merely trims UVA.

The numbers, at 50° latitude

A clear midday in June against a clear midday in December, at a mid-latitude location such as Prague, Vancouver or Frankfurt:

June noonDecember noonWinter / summer
Solar zenith angle~27°~73°
Relative path length~1.1×~3.4×3× longer
UV Index (erythemal, mostly UVB)~7–8~0.7–1÷ 8–10
UVA irradiance~50 W/m²~13 W/m²÷ 4
UVA Index~8~2÷ 4

Read the last column across. Winter does not spare UVA — it cuts it to about a quarter. But it cuts the sunburning band by roughly ten. Per unit of UV Index, a winter noon is delivering somewhere around twice the UVA that a summer noon does.

Two smaller effects push in the same direction. Total-column ozone at mid-northern latitudes peaks in late winter and spring, adding further UVB suppression exactly when the path is longest. And the Earth is closest to the sun in early January, raising top-of-atmosphere irradiance by about 3.4% — a small bonus that reaches the ground almost entirely as UVA, since the extra UVB is absorbed on the way in.

The same logic runs through every day

Season and time of day are the same phenomenon: both are just the solar zenith angle changing. So the daily curve mirrors the annual one.

This is why the UVA Index through the day chart on the calculator has visibly broader shoulders than a UV Index curve for the same day. Both peak at solar noon, but the UVA curve rises earlier, falls later, and never drops as sharply.

A common example, corrected: people sometimes contrast "UV Index 2 in January" with "UV Index 2 at 7 am in July" as if they were different exposure profiles. In fact they are strikingly similar — at 50° latitude both occur at a solar zenith angle near 73–74°, so both carry the same UVA-rich spectrum. That is the real lesson. A low UV Index almost always means a UVA-rich sky, whatever the reason for it being low, because everything that lowers the index — low sun, cloud, glass — suppresses UVB preferentially.

Why this is the case for measuring UVA separately

The UV Index answers one question well: how fast will this sunlight burn me? Since burning is nearly all UVB, the index tracks UVB. That is a legitimate design choice, and for beach-in-August decisions it is the right tool.

But it means the index systematically fails in exactly the conditions where UVA dominates — and those conditions are most of the year, most of the day, and most of the time people are actually outdoors. The photoaging, pigmentation and cumulative damage UVA drives are not seasonal in the way sunburn is. A number weighted for sunburn will always under-represent them.

A dedicated UVA Index is not a replacement for the UV Index. It is the second number you need in order to read the first one correctly.

What to do differently

See how your UVA Index moves through the day →