Reflected UVA: snow, sand, water and concrete

Almost everyone thinks of ultraviolet as arriving from above. A substantial share of it arrives from below — bounced off whatever you are standing on. That reflected component is why the UVA Index calculator asks you to pick a ground surface, and why it reaches skin that direct sunlight physically cannot: the underside of the chin, the nostrils, the eyes beneath a hat brim.

The number that matters: fresh snow reflects 80–90% of the UV that lands on it. Dry sand reflects around 15–25%. Grass reflects about 2%. You can be standing in the same sunlight and receive very different total doses.

UV albedo by surface

Albedo is the fraction of incoming radiation a surface reflects. The critical thing to understand is that UV albedo is not visible albedo — a surface's appearance to your eye is a poor guide to what it does with ultraviolet.

SurfaceUV albedoNotes
Fresh, dry snow0.80–0.90The dominant outlier; near-total reflector
Old, wet or dirty snow0.50–0.60Falls quickly as snow ages and dust accumulates
Dry sand0.15–0.25Pale, dry quartz sand at the top of the range
Wet sand0.07–0.10Water films darken it substantially
Sea foam / whitecaps0.25–0.30Much higher than the water around it
Concrete, paving0.08–0.15Varies with age; new concrete is highest
Open water (diffuse)0.03–0.08Low with a high sun; rises sharply as the sun drops
Asphalt0.04–0.09Low despite its heat
Soil, rock0.04–0.10Pale limestone at the higher end
Grass, vegetation0.01–0.04Effectively a UV sink

Where visible brightness misleads you

Why an 80% albedo does not mean 80% more exposure

Here is the point that most explanations skip, and it is the one that reconciles those dramatic albedo numbers with the modest factors used in the model. Reflectance and dose enhancement are two different quantities. There are two distinct routes by which reflected UVA reaches you, and they behave very differently.

  1. Downwelling enhancement (modest). UV that bounces off snow travels up, some of it is scattered back down by the atmosphere, and it adds to what arrives from above. This multiple-scattering loop is real but lossy: for a horizontal surface under a clear sky, even fresh snow typically adds only about 10–20% to downwelling UV, not 80%. That is what a flat-plate sensor — and this site's model — measures.
  2. Upwelling flux (large, and body-shaped). The other 80%-odd goes straight back up and hits you from below. It never appears in a downwelling measurement at all, but it lands squarely on your chin, nose, eyelids, ears and the underside of your jaw. For a standing person, this can roughly double total body exposure over fresh snow.
The practical consequence: high albedo does not mainly make the sun stronger — it changes where the ultraviolet lands. It redirects a large flux onto exactly the surfaces that are habitually unprotected, because nobody applies sunscreen with upward-facing light in mind.

Snow, and why winter mountains are the extreme case

Fresh snow is a genuine outlier — nothing else in ordinary experience reflects UV like it. Combine it with the things that travel with it and you get the highest-risk UVA setting outside a tropical noon:

This is why photokeratitis — snow blindness, effectively sunburn of the cornea — is a mountain condition rather than a beach one, and why wrap-around eye protection matters more on snow than anywhere else: the light is coming from below the frame of ordinary sunglasses.

Beaches, shade, and the umbrella problem

Sand at 15–25% is far below snow, but beach exposure has its own geometry. Reflected UV from sand strikes the underside of a beach umbrella and is scattered down onto whoever is beneath it, and a large share of UVA is diffuse skylight that an umbrella does not intercept at all. Measurements of beach umbrellas typically find they cut ultraviolet by only about half to three-quarters — useful, but nowhere near the near-total protection people assume they are getting when they move into shade.

The same logic applies to the shade of a single tree, a parasol or a patio umbrella. Shade blocks the direct beam. It does relatively little about the sky, and nothing about the ground.

How the UVA Index models albedo

The calculator's ground-surface selector applies a multiplier to the modelled UVA irradiance:

Selector optionFactorRationale
Grass / default×1.00~2% reflectance; the baseline
Water×1.00Low diffuse UV reflectance from above
Sand / beach×1.04Dry sand ~15–25%, modest downwelling gain
Snow×1.10Highly reflective, but the horizontal-surface gain is bounded

Those multipliers look small next to the albedo table above, and now you know why: the model reports downwelling UVA on an open horizontal surface, so it captures route 1 and not route 2. The large upwelling flux that actually causes chin and eye burns is a property of your body's geometry, not of the sky, and is explicitly out of scope.

Two practical notes on using the selector. Concrete and paving are not options — at 0.08–0.15 they sit between grass and sand, and grass is the closer approximation for a city street. And "Water" at ×1.00 describes standing beside or above water with a reasonably high sun; with a low sun, or on a bright choppy sea, the real reflected component is higher than the model's flat treatment suggests.

What to take from this

Set your ground surface in the UVA Index calculator →